Darryl Broderick
Partner, Cork Office
A partner in RDJ's Litigation and Dispute Resolution team, Darryl is also a member of the firm’s IP, Media, Insolvency and Corporate Restructuring teams. He has extensive experience in litigation and dispute resolution with a particular emphasis on financial services litigation, contentious media, technology and IP disputes, as well as acting for liquidators and receivers in insolvency related litigation.
Darryl is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and a member of Restructuring and Insolvency Ireland (formerly known as the Irish Society of Insolvency Practitioners) . He has advised clients on a wide range of corporate and commercial disputes including defamation claims, breach of privacy claims, intellectual property disputes, property possession claims, summary judgment proceedings and asset transfer proceedings and in many disputes grounded in negligence and breach of contract. He has also represented client in mediations and arbitrations both in Ireland and in other EU jurisdictions.
Education
University College Cork (BCL)
University College Dublin (Diploma in Business Studies) (Diploma in Arbitration law)
Professional
Admitted as a solicitor in Ireland.
Personal Insolvency Practitioner Certificate (Law Society of Ireland).
Accolades
Darryl is ranked by Chambers Europe for his work in Media Law. He is also recognised by The Legal 500 for his work in Dispute Resolution, Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment, and Insolvency and Corporate Restructuring.
Darryl is always immaculately prepared, offers good written work and is extremely responsive.– Chambers Europe (2025)
Fantastic, very responsive, pragmatic and gets straight to the point.– Chambers Europe (2025)
Darryl Broderick is available to us at all times. He understands our deadline pressures and remains focused, no matter the urgency– The Legal 500 (2024)
A joy to deal with, and always comes back ASAP as he is very cognisant of our fast-moving environment.– The Legal 500 (2024)
Related Content
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck…
The High Court has once again expressed its frustration with “quack lawyers” advising lay litigants to bring nonsensical, unmeritorious applications before the Court, which ap...
A Balancing Act: New Guidance from the DPC on How to Deal with Mixed Personal Data in Subject Access Requests
Understanding when an organisation is separately entitled or obliged to restrict access to personal data pursuant to a data access request continues to be one of the main area...
Protecting Your Reputation: Legal Strategies for Effective Reputation Management
In today's digital age, protecting a company's reputation is paramount. In our latest Insight, Darryl Broderick and James Leahy explore the significant risks businesses face ...
Court of Appeal refuses attempt by partner of borrower to frustrate repossession of property
In a recent ruling, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's decision to refuse an injunction application, brought by a partner of one of the Respondents to the proceedings...
Understanding CCTV and discovery: What you can and can’t do with civil proceedings materials
In a recent ruling, Judge Alex Owens prevented Conor McGregor from disseminating and releasing CCTV footage obtained in the discovery phase of the civil assault case against h...
Who has standing? Examining jurisdiction in substitution applications before the Court of Appeal
A recent High Court decision referred a preliminary jurisdictional issue to the Court of Appeal to consider the merits of substitution applications in the context of appeals. ...