Imelda Tierney
Partner, Galway Office
Imelda is a Partner, practising as part of the Healthcare Litigation team. She advises clients on all forms of legal disputes with a current particular emphasis on medical malpractice actions on behalf of hospitals and healthcare professionals including regularly acting as the advocate for clinicians and hospitals at Inquests. Imelda has advised clients on all aspects of healthcare provision both contentious and non-contentious and was previously a member of a hospital ethics committee.
She has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in all courts including the commercial division of the High Court and frequently acts in the defence of high value and sensitive clinical negligence claims.
Imelda is a CEDR accredited mediator and is a strong advocate of alternative dispute resolution. Imelda encourages clients to engage in the mediation process where appropriate and she frequently represents both healthcare and non-healthcare clients in mediation.
Education
University of Galway (BA) (LLB)
University College Dublin (Postgraduate Diploma in Equality Studies)
Professional
Admitted as a solicitor in Ireland. Accredited mediator (CEDR).
Accolades
Imelda has been recognised by Chambers Europe and The Legal 500 for her work in Healthcare Law.
Practice Areas
Sectors
Imelda Tierney is an immensely knowledgeable, astute and practical adviser.– Chambers Europe (2025)
Imelda Tierney is a really fantastic lawyer.– Chambers Europe (2024)
Imelda Tierney is an excellent advocate and is a great support to clients when attending court. Has exceptional interpersonal communication skills, is very well organised and is highly respected.– The Legal 500 (2023)
Imelda Tierney has the ability of uncomplicating the complex. Her case management skills have yet to be equalled. Her attention to detail and mastery of the issues are excellent– Chambers Europe (2023)
Related Content
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck…
The High Court has once again expressed its frustration with “quack lawyers” advising lay litigants to bring nonsensical, unmeritorious applications before the Court, which ap...
A Balancing Act: New Guidance from the DPC on How to Deal with Mixed Personal Data in Subject Access Requests
Understanding when an organisation is separately entitled or obliged to restrict access to personal data pursuant to a data access request continues to be one of the main area...
The High Court approves modular trial of two distinct questions of fact in a medical negligence claim
RDJ’s Healthcare Department, acting on behalf of the HSE, successfully brought an application for a modular trial in a complex medical negligence action. In this Insight Jenny...
Court of Appeal refuses attempt by partner of borrower to frustrate repossession of property
In a recent ruling, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's decision to refuse an injunction application, brought by a partner of one of the Respondents to the proceedings...
Understanding CCTV and discovery: What you can and can’t do with civil proceedings materials
In a recent ruling, Judge Alex Owens prevented Conor McGregor from disseminating and releasing CCTV footage obtained in the discovery phase of the civil assault case against h...
Who has standing? Examining jurisdiction in substitution applications before the Court of Appeal
A recent High Court decision referred a preliminary jurisdictional issue to the Court of Appeal to consider the merits of substitution applications in the context of appeals. ...